ARLINGTON, Texas—Forty percent of American consumers are more likely to consume foods labeled as “rich in antioxidants” very frequently or somewhat frequently compared to 25 percent who prefer foods labeled as “antioxidants added”, according to Decision Analyst’s Food Ingredients: What’s Hot? Report.
Based on a survey of 16,392 U.S. grocery shoppers, the findings indicates that consumers prefer the label copy “rich in” as opposed to “added.” In fact, 27 percent preferred “rich in omega-3, compared to 19 percent who preferred “omega-3 added”; 25 percent preferred “rich in iron” compared to 15 percent who preferred “iron added.”
"Our findings suggest that more Americans frequently consume products labeled ‘rich in’ these ingredients, compared to products that have the same ingredients ‘added.’ This is likely due to the perception that foods rich in an ingredient are more natural and less processed, compared to foods that have these ingredients added to them during the manufacturing process,” said Diane Brewton, senior vice president of the Market Intelligence Group at Decision Analyst. “Consumer perceptions and beliefs about ingredients contained in their foods, as well as nutritional information on food packaging, are important factors driving their purchase behavior. Understanding consumer knowledge and beliefs is crucial for food marketers, as this helps them effectively highlight healthful, or even ‘magic,’ product ingredients in messaging and packaging claims.”
