Lynn A. KuntzThe Hot Pot RSS

The Hot Pot is a goulash of news, opinions and advice about designing food products and other issues affecting our industry. Its moderator and sometimes contributor is Lynn A. Kuntz, editor of Food Product Design. A lifetime of food-industry experience, first in the trenches and currently via the written word, has shaped her knowledge base and her opinions―and she's not afraid to use either of them.

07/13/2009

"Food Inc": Food Industry on Film

There is certainly enough in the news to have quickly buried the premier of the movie "Food Inc." But just before it opened I submitted an editorial for the print version of Food Product Design that still raises a lot of questions.


“Food, Inc.” Stincs


Here we go again. By the time you read this, the theatrical release of the latest food-industry hit job, “Food, Inc.,” will be history. The film’s website describes it thus: “Corn is the vegetable-as-villain in ‘Food, Inc.,’ which builds on the work of nutritionists, journalists and activists Eric Schlosser (“Fast Food Nation”) and Michael Pollan (“The Omnivore's Dilemma”) to show how multinationals have taken over the production of food. The movie tells us corn—which today assumes dozens of ubiquitous identities, notably high-fructose corn syrup—is kept at unrealistically low prices by the government, is fed to animals that haven't evolved to eat it (such as the cow), causes those animals to develop maladies that must be treated with antibiotics (which are passed on to consumers), and has led to the mutation of new strains of the E. coli, which sickens tens of thousands each year.”
Where to start? Perhaps hunt for the peer-reviewed study that shows cause and effect for the theory that corn mutates E. coli …
Without seeing the movie I really can’t make a valid argument to counter any potential controversy. And, while I’m sure the food industry has its share of problems—Peanut Corporation of America comes immediately to mind—I’m guessing the movie is mostly a modern-day version of yellow journalism. The filmmakers are certainly tapping into a wave of anti-corporate sentiment and likely suggest replacing the current food industry with an unrealistic bucolic utopia filled with happy cows—just as advertised. And they’re feeding the collective insight oozing from the blogosphere, including this amateur movie review lurking just a web-search click or two away: “People just need to stop trying to add chemicals to food, that’s how we invented cancer.”
It shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone that, like any other industry, the food industry collides with politics and profits—and that there are instances of abuse. Business was that way 100 years ago, and conceivably will still be that way 100 years hence.
But I’m getting tired of this industry being blamed for everything from global warming to intentional poisoning of the populace. While the food industry is trying to fight back by adopting web strategies like SafeFoodInc.com, I doubt that will do much to counteract the relentless message that, if you don’t buy your food fresh from a local farmer who knows all his carrots by name … YOU’RE GOING TO DIE! Individuals who work in the industry need to step up and say, “Hey, we eat this stuff and feed it to our families, too.”
Lastly, I wish rabid locavores would preach from North Dakota in the dead of winter instead of from the cornucopia that is relentlessly irrigated California. Plus, they are invited to come and cull the local deer herd that grazed their way through my backyard bean patch. I have plenty of freezer space, and suburban-grass- and garden-fed venison sounds like good eating. They can even name them first.
   -Lynn A. Kuntz


Comments

1

NCOAProcessing 07/18/2009 08:16

Though equal calorically to the average US diet is significantly higher in saturated fats and cholesterol than ours.


2

internet TV 07/17/2009 20:59

I guess, modern day of living and lifestyle are the factors too, why we have experience illnesses and diseases. And this were not merely straight causes, but food industry has also it's participation of why this thing occurs. There are those that just after the profit but not minding the quality and health of their consumers. Thus, awareness on the part of the buyer must be considered.

3

Susie 07/15/2009 13:20

It would be convenient if we could blame the food industry for our ills, but as professionals, we realize it's complex. Cultural differences, air quality, water quality, genetics...they are all factors that affect our health. I hope this film does not put too much emphasis on food without suggesting other factors. Like the food industry, the film industry has to make money.

4

Stuart Reb Donald 07/13/2009 18:36

"Without seeing the movie I really can’t make a valid argument. . . "
You also cannot make any reliable statements about its content. I have not seen the movie either so I am making no judgments to its accuracy. However, by criticizing a movie you have not seen you lose all credibility. In fact, using your own criteria this post is, "a modern-day version of yellow journalism."

You are right that one must take with a grain of salt any claims lacking a "peer-reviewed study that shows cause and effect for the theory that corn mutates E. coli." At the same time, I failed to see you list any peer-reviewed study that shows that corn does not mutate E. coli. Furthermore, without either of us having seen the movie we do not know if the movie even alleges any coloration between genetically modified corn and the sudden appearance of more aggressive and resistant strains of E. coli.

The facts we do have state that high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) cannot be naturally burned as fuel but rather must be metabolized in the liver. The liver then develops fatty deposits and cirrhosis, similar to problems that develop in the livers of alcoholics (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2002 Vol. 76, No. 5, 911-922). Which certainly blows a hole in those pro-corn syrup commercials whose only defense of their product is that the average American does not know the harmful effects of HFCS therefore they must not exist.

It is also beyond debate that European nations whose cultures place a priority on fresh, locally produced foods have significantly fewer occurrences of coronary heart disease than the US. This anomaly has been labeled “the French Paradox” because the French diet, though equal calorically to the average US diet is significantly higher in saturated fats and cholesterol than ours. Only Japan (another nation devoted to fresh, local foods) has fewer occurrences of heart disease. This statistic is supported by studies from the USDA, the Italian Food and Agriculture Organization, the medical journal Hippocrates, The New York Times, and “60 Minutes” to name a few.

5

Rachel 07/13/2009 17:02

You have verbalized my exact thoughts! For everyone who asks for my opinion, I will direct them here! Thanks!

Post a Comment

 

announcements