|
Importing or exporting improperly labeled food products
can have costly consequences for manufacturers, as shipments can either
be delayed or denied entry. Significant warehousing costs can accrue
until labeling compliance is achieved. The quality and condition of
perishable items can deteriorate to the point that they cannot be sold.
In February 2003 alone, FDA denied entry of more than 400 shipments
of food into the United States because they lacked the proper labeling. Marketing food products globally requires careful attention to each countrys labeling laws. Companies will likely find that compliance with U.S. laws alone is insufficient, and they must ensure that they are aware of the various entities and laws that regulate product labeling. Certain labeling information such as product name, ingredient listings and name of manufacturer or packager may be common to many countries, but other required elements will vary by country, and each nation may have its own specific formatting and language requirements. This article provides a brief overview of the entities that regulate food-product labeling in the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan, as well as the main laws and regulations in each.
FDAs authority is principally found in the Federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), which defines food as
articles used for food or drink for man or other animals, chewing
gum, and articles used for components of any such article. The
Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA), and the Dietary
Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) amended the FDCA.
The NLEA prescribed mandatory nutrition labeling for food products,
while DSHEA imposed labeling requirements for dietary supplements and
authorized the making of certain claims. Dietary supplements were formally
recognized as a food within the meaning of the FDCA. The FDCA, together
with its implementing regulations, sets forth specific food-labeling
requirements. The Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) also provides
specific product-labeling requirements that are similar in certain respects
to the FDCA. While individual state food-labeling laws generally follow
the federal requirements, certain states may also have enacted their
own requirements for specific products. A state may not want to wait
for the federal government to act, and will look at ways to protect
the health of the states citizens. For example, Texas has special
warning requirements for dietary-supplement products containing ephedra.
In California, Proposition 65 requires warnings on foods or any other
products containing any of the chemicals noted on a list prepared by
the state that are known to cause cancer or reproductive harm. Food products sold in the United States must have a label
written in English that bears the product name (the statement of identity);
net quantity of contents; ingredients; name and address of manufacturer,
packer or distributor; and Nutrition Facts panel. FDA regulations
impose detailed requirements as to how these items must appear on the
product label, including where they must appear, the format, the font
size and the order of appearance. Nutrient-content claims, those that characterize the level
of a nutrient in a food, may appear on food-product labeling, provided
that they meet the regulatory requirements. These include claims such
as free, low, high, good source,
lean, reduced, less, light,
more and extra, as noted in Title 21 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), sections 101.13 and 101.54 through
101.69. Also, health claims (a claim that links a substance and a disease,
such as calcium reduces the risk of osteoporosis) must have
FDA approval. This is found in 21 CFR, sections 101.14 and 101.70 through
101.81. Dietary supplements have specific requirements: The label
must include a Supplement Facts panel; it must identify
the product as a dietary supplement; and it must list the
name and quantity of each ingredient. Manufacturers may not label a
dietary supplement as a conventional food or as the sole item of a diet. The FDCA also sets forth parameters governing which claims
may appear on dietary-supplement labels, which include, among other
things, claims that either state that the product is intended to affect
the structure or function of the human body (e.g. support
healthy joints) or provide a benefit related to a classical nutrient
deficiency disease (e.g. the role of vitamin D in preventing rickets).
There must be adequate support to make this sort of claim and manufacturers
must notify FDA that they intend to make a health-related claim. In
addition, the following disclaimer must be included on the label: This
statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any
disease. Importantly, dietary-supplement labels may not bear any claims related to the treatment, cure or prevention of a disease. The line between a permissible structure-function claim and an impermissible disease claim is often difficult to define. FDA has provided its opinion on many of these claims, and manufacturers should take care to ensure any product-label claim is permissible under FDA guidelines.
Health Canada oversees health and safety standards and
develops food-labeling policies regarding health and nutrition pursuant
to the Food and Drugs Act. The CFIA administers food-labeling policies
pursuant to the Food and Drugs Act and CPLA. The Food and Drugs Act regulates food made, sold or packaged
in Canada. The Act also covers food labeling, advertising and importation.
The Act specifies the information that the product must have on its
label, including the foods common name, the manufacturers
or producers name and address, and a list of ingredients. Complete
labeling information must appear in English and French. CPLA also governs the labeling of consumer food products
and has overlapping requirements with the Food and Drugs Act. For example,
they both require the products common name, and the manufacturers
name and address on the label in both English and French. The CPLA also
requires that the label declare the net quantity of the food product. On January 1, 2003, Health Canada published amendments to the FDR, changing them in three ways. First, the amended regulations mandate that manufacturers must have a label on prepackaged foods listing calories and 13 specific nutrients subject to certain exemptions in a nutrition-facts panel. Second, the amendments update requirements regarding nutrient-content claims by establishing standardized reference and serving amounts to evaluate nutrient content, and they update the wording allowed for nutrient-content claims. Finally, the amendments permit claims that particular foods may reduce the risk of certain chronic diseases, such as heart disease, osteoporosis, high blood pressure and stroke. These regulations apply not only to product labeling, but also to advertising.
Council Directive 2000/13/EC is the presiding legislation
on the labeling of food sold to consumers in the EU. The directive was
enacted as a means of consolidating the many amendments to Council Directive
79/112/EEC, which established the basic rules for food labeling in the
EU in December 1978. Article 2 of Council Directive 2000/13/EC provides that
labeling must not mislead a purchaser in any material way. The labeling
must not mislead a purchaser with regard to any characteristic of the
food, such as its nature, identity, properties, composition, quantity,
durability, origin, or method of manufacture or production; by attributing
any effect or property to the food which it does not possess; or by
suggesting that the food possesses special characteristics when all
similar foods possess such characteristics. In addition, the directive
prohibits any claim that a food product is capable of preventing, treating
or curing a human disease. Similar to laws enacted in the United States
and Canada, the directive mandates that certain key information appear
on food labels, including the name under which the product is sold;
the list of ingredients; the quantity of certain ingredients or categories
of ingredients; the net quantity (for prepackaged food products); the
date of minimum durability (or best before date); and the name and address
of the manufacturer or packager, or of a seller established in the EU.
The EC also has enacted specific laws regarding nutrition labeling. Council Directive 90/496/EEC prescribes nutrition-labeling parameters for foods sold to consumers. Unlike the United States, nutrition labeling is not required unless a nutrition claim is made on the label or advertising material a representation that states or suggests that a food has particular nutrition properties due to the energy (calories) it provides and/or nutrients it contains. Only nutrition claims that relate to energy value, proteins, carbohydrates, fat, dietary fiber, sodium, vitamins and minerals are permissible.
Japan also has implemented a food-labeling law that specifically
recognizes certain food products that are consumed For A Specific
Health Use (FOSHU). Only foods approved for such a use may bear
the title FOSHU on their label. FOSHU foods are similar
to functional foods and consist of foods similar in appearance
to conventional foods, consumed as part of a usual diet, and demonstrated
(to have) physiological benefits and/or reduce the risk of chronic disease
beyond basic nutritional functions. To use the FOSHU label, the manufacturers product
must contain MHLW preapproved foods or ingredients. The MHLW has established
a list of such foods and ingredients that it deems backed by sufficient
scientific evidence to support health claims. Marketers should consult
this list before labeling a product as FOSHU. The FOSHU system also
requires specific information to appear on products labeling,
including, but not limited to, the approved health claim, the nutrition
information, the list of ingredients and an indication that the food
is FOSHU. Understanding the food-labeling requirements of different nations, as well as the other laws and regulations applicable to food products such as restrictions on ingredients, manufacturing and packaging requirements, and licensure requirements can help manufacturers involved in the global economy avoid costly business disruptions. By taking a proactive stance and investigating these laws before they attempt to sell food products in foreign countries, companies can eliminate disruption concerns while offering products to a worldwide consumer base.
Ivan J. Wasserman is a partner in the Food and Drug Administration practice at Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC in Washington, D.C., and received his J.D. from The George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C. He can be reached at iwasserman@colliershannon.com. Elisa A. Nemiroff is an associate in the advertising and marketing practice at Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, and also received her J.D. from The George Washington University Law School. She may be reached at enemiroff@colliershannon.com. |
The Wide World of Food Regulations
Comments
- Comments